1964 Holden EH vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH.
Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | EH | Matrix |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2601 mm |