1964 Holden EH vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 702 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Holden | Cadillac |
Model | EH | XTS |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2831 mm |