1964 Holden EJ vs. 1951 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1964 Holden EJ is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jaguar C-Type (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EJ weights approximately 165 kg more than 1951 Jaguar C-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jaguar C-Type (298 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1951 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EJ | 1951 Jaguar C-Type | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | EJ | C-Type |
Year Released | 1964 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2440 mm |