1964 Holden EJ vs. 1962 Holden FB Special
To start off, 1964 Holden EJ is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden FB Special is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 64 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EJ weights approximately 30 kg more than 1962 Holden FB Special.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 163 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EJ | 1962 Holden FB Special | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | EJ | FB Special |
Year Released | 1964 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2670 mm |