1964 Holden EJ vs. 1973 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 1973 Sunbeam Alpine is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Sunbeam Alpine (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Sunbeam Alpine should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EJ weights approximately 116 kg more than 1973 Sunbeam Alpine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Sunbeam Alpine. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EJ | 1973 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Holden | Sunbeam |
Model | EJ | Alpine |
Year Released | 1964 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1014 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |