1964 Holden EJ vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 323 (130 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ.
Because 1964 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (137 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EJ | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EJ | 323 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
