1964 Holden EJ vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner

To start off, 1996 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 720 kg more than 1964 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: