1964 Holden EJ vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EJ weights approximately 195 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1964 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EJ | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | EJ | Clio |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2770 mm |
