1964 Holden EJ vs. 2002 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2002 Holden Cruze is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Cruze (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EJ weights approximately 145 kg more than 2002 Holden Cruze.
Because 2002 Holden Cruze is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Cruze will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Cruze. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EJ | 2002 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | EJ | Cruze |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2370 mm |