1964 Holden EJ vs. 2005 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 675 kg more than 1964 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EJ | 2005 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | EJ | XK |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 411 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2590 mm |