1964 Holden EJ vs. 2007 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2007 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Suzuki SX4 (143 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Suzuki SX4 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ.
Because 2007 Suzuki SX4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Suzuki SX4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Suzuki SX4 (184 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2007 Suzuki SX4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EJ | 2007 Suzuki SX4 | |
| Make | Holden | Suzuki |
| Model | EJ | SX4 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
