1964 Holden EJ vs. 2009 Lada 21
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lada 21 (89 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lada 21 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EJ weights approximately 85 kg more than 2009 Lada 21.
Because 1964 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada 21, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (131 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EJ | 2009 Lada 21 | |
Make | Holden | Lada |
Model | EJ | 21 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2500 mm |