1964 Holden EJ vs. 2009 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2009 Lotus Evora is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lotus Evora (342 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2009 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EJ | 2009 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | EJ | Evora |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2580 mm |