1964 Holden EJ vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ.
Because 2010 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EJ | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
| Make | Holden | Peugeot |
| Model | EJ | 3008 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1837 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1639 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2613 mm |
