1964 Holden EK vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1964 Holden EK is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | EK | XK |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
