1964 Holden EK vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 5,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass (125 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Holden | Oldsmobile |
| Model | EK | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 5798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 125 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
