1964 Holden EK vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (123 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (172 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | EK | Celeste |
Year Released | 1964 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 172 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |