1964 Holden EK vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EK (65 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (75 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | EK | Polo |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 38 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 75 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1590 mm |