1964 Holden EK vs. 1986 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1986 Toyota Celica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Toyota Celica (115 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Toyota Celica (172 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 1986 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 1986 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EK | Celica |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 115 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
