1964 Holden EK vs. 1989 Nissan Micra
To start off, 1989 Nissan Micra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EK (65 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1989 Nissan Micra. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 1989 Nissan Micra.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Nissan Micra. (73 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 1989 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | EK | Micra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 73 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
