1964 Holden EK vs. 1989 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1989 Rover Range Rover is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Rover Range Rover (185 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Rover Range Rover (319 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 1989 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 1989 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Holden | Rover |
| Model | EK | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3947 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
