1964 Holden EK vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | EK | Apollo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
