1964 Holden EK vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Sable (248 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Holden | Mercury |
| Model | EK | Sable |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 248 Nm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
