1964 Holden EK vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Neon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Plymouth Neon (131 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Plymouth Neon should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Neon (175 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Plymouth Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2000 Plymouth Neon | |
| Make | Holden | Plymouth |
| Model | EK | Neon |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 131 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
