1964 Holden EK vs. 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser (161 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser (343 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | EK | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 343 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |