1964 Holden EK vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | EK | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 245 Nm |
