1964 Holden EK vs. 2001 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2001 Toyota Celica is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Celica (190 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Celica (180 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2001 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | EK | Celica |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 180 Nm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |