1964 Holden EK vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (229 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z3 (300 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2002 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Holden | BMW |
| Model | EK | Z3 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 229 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
