1964 Holden EK vs. 2002 Kia Retona
To start off, 2002 Kia Retona is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Retona (90 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Retona should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Retona (205 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Retona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2002 Kia Retona | |
| Make | Holden | Kia |
| Model | EK | Retona |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 90 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
