1964 Holden EK vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | EK | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
