1964 Holden EK vs. 2003 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2003 Lincoln LS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lincoln LS (276 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2003 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2003 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Holden | Lincoln |
| Model | EK | LS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3934 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 276 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1870 mm |
