1964 Holden EK vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (148 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Roadster (167 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EK | Roadster |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 167 Nm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |