1964 Holden EK vs. 2003 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2003 Seat Toledo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Seat Toledo (104 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Seat Toledo should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Seat Toledo. (148 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Seat Toledo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2003 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Holden | Seat |
| Model | EK | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
