1964 Holden EK vs. 2003 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2003 Toyota Sienna is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,997 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Sienna (173 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Sienna (294 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2003 Toyota Sienna | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EK | Sienna |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 173 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 294 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1870 mm |
