1964 Holden EK vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (148 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 3 (187 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EK | 3 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
