1964 Holden EK vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (160 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (230 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EK | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 230 Nm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |