1964 Holden EK vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma (101 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma. (141 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | EK | Carisma |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 101 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 141 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |