1964 Holden EK vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (145 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (208 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | EK | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 145 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 208 Nm |
