1964 Holden EK vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero (158 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero (373 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | EK | Pajero |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1880 mm |
