1964 Holden EK vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (67 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 160 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | EK | Clio |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |