1964 Holden EK vs. 2008 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJ is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XJ (400 HP) has 335 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJ (553 Nm) has 393 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2008 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | EK | XJ |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 400 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 553 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
