1964 Holden EK vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (114 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cee'd (255 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2009 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Holden | Kia |
| Model | EK | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1582 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
