1964 Holden EK vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. Both 1964 Holden EK and 2009 Mazda 3 are equipped with a 2,260 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (263 HP) has 198 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (380 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EK | 3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 263 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |