1964 Holden EK vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EK | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |