1964 Holden EK vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (101 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (240 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EK | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | EK | Polo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 101 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |