1964 Holden EK vs. 2010 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2010 Toyota Sienna is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Sienna (266 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Sienna (332 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2010 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2010 Toyota Sienna | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EK | Sienna |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 266 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 332 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1966 mm |
