1964 Holden EK vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (178 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (250 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2010 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
| Model | EK | Polo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 178 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1682 mm |
