1964 Holden EK vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 208 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EK | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 273 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1935 mm |
