1964 Holden EK vs. 2011 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2011 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP) has 205 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota 4Runner (376 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2011 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2011 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EK | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 270 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 376 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1925 mm |
