1964 Holden EK vs. 2012 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2012 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Buick LaCrosse (182 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Buick LaCrosse (233 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2012 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2012 Buick LaCrosse | |
| Make | Holden | Buick |
| Model | EK | LaCrosse |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 182 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1857 mm |
